Just for the record, Joe grizzly has already stated he thought the first RZ had merit, but the second was an abomination. Then goes on to say it’s the mask that helps him to like various entries in the franchise.
Here’s what you said back in November of last year Joe. You said his second film was an abomination. Yet now here you are singing it’s praises.
Here your opinion has shifted, Joe, if it differs from this older post. Just like any other folks on here who’s opinions and thoughts shift on things. Read below and compare your posts in this thread. So to get heated over this, when you yourself have shifting opinions, is a bit odd.
User avatarJoe Grizzly
Re: Love or hate the sequels?
Unread post Thu Nov 02, 2017 5:35 pm
“Halloween is probably my favorite horror film of all time. Despite some flaws, I love Halloween 2. The rest I could do without but don’t hate all of them. H20 and 4 are ok. I enjoy 5 and 6 mildly for minor reasons. 3 was brutal and Resurrection was a steaming turd of a movie, the “Jason Takes Manhattan” of Halloween only worse. If I could make myself forget that the franchise had existed before Zombie’s take I could say his first one had merit, but the second was an abomination.
I think the aesthetic of the masks is something that affects my liking of the films, silly as it may be. The original mask, especially the H2 version, was amazing. I thought the H5 mask was pretty scary. other than they, IMO they all suck. I thought H4 was one of the better installments but that mask was just so lame.”
And then here is another post, where you are not a fan of the humanizing of Myers:
Top
User avatarJoe Grizzly
Re: BAD news for the new halloween movie
Unread post Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:51 pm
"As has already been conveyed here, playing this facade that he started as a “regular human” is silly as many scenes in H1 itself, and ESPECIALLY the ending, made it quite clear he was not normal, and Loomis sold that the entire movie. People actually debating this or trying to argue around it is silly. I would argue that point being hammered him is what etched Michael in history as the quintessential boogeyman in films.
I think the remake humanizing him, while interesting, was part of what largely killed the mystique of the character.
I understand that you have to do new things over time, but this is part of why attempts at prolonging Michael’s story has been problematic."
So there you have it. That’s your subjective opinion that has clearly shifted, and your entitled to it. Nothing wrong with that. I have no issues with Joe’s opinions and thoughts, even though he has plenty of problems with everyone else’s. I personally have never bashed him for it, but he has bashed all of us over our take on things.
Got to take the high road sometimes and not bite each other’s heads off over subjective material.