“Original Perfect Shaped 1975 Kirk” or MDK

The only problem I have with those lineage charts Hedge is they don’t explain what’s different/what’s changed. Like example what is different from a Billy Kirkus Kirk to a ToTs H4? If the Billy kirkus kirk is a direct cast off a 75 why did multiple people change and mess with the sculpt?

THIS IS WHAT WE NEED. Sadly I think a lot of new collectors will kind of feel “short changed” when they find out their mask isn’t as special as they thought. Everything with kirk lineage came from recasts or recasts of recasts of recasts which new guys may not understand that not only does recasting and enlarging gives you less detail but it also expands and distorts features like the nose and washes out the lips, eyes, ears, mouth, distorts and misshapes the piece then they press it and have to basically resculpt most of the sculpt and call it a “75 Kirk based mask”.

Then someone uses a 4th gen recast/enlargement and says its casted from a 75. Its a dirty little half truth, but sounds great to the new guys. This is one of the reasons we probally don’t hear alot about the true origins of some projects because us old heads know how sensitive people get when the truth comes out. An artist will say its from a kirk and beat around it’s true Base and will say it’s a 75 casting/pressing/enlargement/scan but not say its a Frankenstein build and they had to practically rebuild and resculpt everything.

There has only been Kirk casts and clay pressings from 3 or 4 kirks. Seans old “destroyed kirk”, Billys, and Medleys. The new guys hear “casted from a kirk or 3d scanned or pressed from an original”, but in reality the artist is using 2,3,4,5 plus gen recasts, retools, enlargements so by the time a lot of these new Kirks or Myers have been made they have been pressed and tinkered with that it’s really not a Kirk anymore, but more an armature or base for a clay retooling.

If you have to sculpt the eyes back in, fix the lips, the cheeks, the ears, the eye brows, the texture, the neck, chin and all the other details from an old 3rd or 4th gen, add all the “mistakes” such as the ear half circle the forehead dent back in etc. and call it “Casted from a real 75” is highly misleading.

Alot of people are doing this and come out with really great things with all their hard work don’t get me wrong and it really does show, but their delivery on the origins is less than. Most of these Kirk/Myers Masks are just “Frankenstein” pressings. Ears from one mask to use for another sculpt, new eyes for another, this nose looks better on this sculpt so on and so on. It seems a lot of these “from a real 75” or “75 lineage” or “kirk cast” in reality are pieces that have been enlarged recasted retooled repressed Mr. Potato Heads.

6 Likes

100% this, and now the market is overstaurated with this kind of advertisement and it’s truly annoying, the recent sculpts that hold up well are the I.D being great from a ground up, and then there is the Starman, which makes a killer H2, AHG’s Stab 3 brings back the retro style sculpts, same for the 13 mask, I also am biased in liking Ph’s Kirk, since he not only used the lifecast, he actually put in the effort to use it right for his masks features, and just look at his H4’s to see how far he has come, he keeps getting better, Rowland as well has been putting out great finishes and working on his own sculpts

2 Likes

Wow I did not know any of that. Makes me wonder if a 98 proto really is anything special now or it was just a good base and Nag filled in all of the details. Wonder if the results would be the same if someone recasted a 75 Kirk but didn’t enlarge it at all? Thank you for your explanation me and whole lot of people probably ain’t realized that, there’s a lot that doesn’t get told to the public with this kind of crap. The ID also is one of the very best ground up sculpts but I feel like it’s almost impossible to own when the owner doesn’t want to create them anymore, waste of potential honestly.

2 Likes

His Halloween 6 ground up sculpt is actually pretty good but then again it’s also cause he has really good reference (the hero mask right in front of him) and also the price he charges for the “hero” 3d scan version is absolutely absurd. He is very annoying with how many different masks versions he releases a lot of them seem very useless and it’s very unprofessional how he doesn’t have like a list at least set up on his page you have to constantly ask him what different masks he has etc.

1 Like

I must make this clear. In no way am I attacking any artist whatsoever and I feel if they feel attacked it’s because they know they are misleading a potential buyer with fancy buzz words and misleading new collectors into thinking they are getting something truly special when in reality 9 times out of 10 if it’s not a ground up sculpt they are just buying the same 3 or 4 3rd 4th 5th plus generation recasts just retooled, reshaped, time and time again from different artists throughout the years.

There is NO artist out there selling unaltered unenlarged direct recasts of a 1975 Captain Kirk mask. This is a fact, however different artists and different finishers all bring something new and fresh to the table in their own way and we do get great pieces out of it from the various variations, but the fact this new generation of collectors do not know this and are not being told exactly what they are getting is less than outstanding and I feel as a community we need to do better and help educate the new guys on how these “Kirk Lineage” masks are truly made.

The truth about “Lineage” masks these days is this. “Hey I’m Starting a new Kirk mask that is 100% “1975 Capt. Kirk Based” Are they lying? No. Are they being honest also No.

6 Likes

ok ok thanks

1 Like

so with this being said what mask actually has the most direct lineage, this probably isn’t a very linear question so what do ya’ll think?

1 Like

He also did a complete copy paste of the original KH/DW which he sculpted and had an original, side by side

1 Like

Justin has the most Lineage I would say with his original Nightmare mask

1 Like

With this, an honest question I have to ask, what does that make the 3DK?

1 Like

wait so the Nightowl: Nightmareman, the Nightowl: Nightmareman78, or the NAG: Nightmare

1 Like

Nags 98 Proto is a direct cast of an enlarged Captain Kirk.

The orignal run 98 protos were pristine and best as you can get for a Kirk.

The NAG nightmare and the NAG 98 Proto are both basically orignal Kirk’s the orignal protos are absolutely the best u can get if that’s what u want. Like a 2016-2018 Proto, amazing. Now the nightmare did not have eyes, so that’s intresting but it still has its details.

I’m not sure what Kenny is talking about where people are placing parts on their sculpts? I know the 2k Kirk by Nag he placed the ears and maybe eyebrows on the 2k, but I’ve never heard of anyone else doing that. Especially not Justin Mabry. He doesn’t care that much about Kirk’s.

1 Like

The 3DK is a scan of a rehauled/rebuilt Sean Clark Small.

I posted this somewhere a while back, but I know how easy that stuff gets lost and forgotten in a huge forum.

The short version, if I’m remembering correctly, is that a guy found an old Myers mask he had in storage and sent it to Jimmy to be refurbished. The details on what it needed were kept pretty close to the vest. I don’t know what kind of condition it was in at this point and what Jimmy had to do to bring it back to life.

When Jimmy received the mask he realized that it was an original Sean Clark Small in pretty good condition overall. He asked the guy if he wanted to have it scanned and made into a wearable/sellable mask and the guy agreed. Bingo. The 3DK was born.

Edit: 3DK mask?

2 Likes

Man am I glad I don’t overcomplicate my fandom. I like what I like, I buy what I like, and to me it’s great because it’s all in the eye of the beholder. Then I have fun and take pics. :wink::jack_o_lantern:

2 Likes

Yes hedge it was this mask

Yep. I added an edit to the bottom of my post yesterday. That’s the link to the thread. I can’t remember the guy’s name, though. Not that it matters, but he has a pretty sweet collection he posts on Facebook.

1 Like

Oh nice my bad

Soooooooo “original 75 Kirk master mold”….. full of shit orrrr?

NAGmasks wrote: “Hi everyone, i need your input on this, what do you prefer to see coming out, the orginial perfect shaped 1975 kirk on the left or an exact replica 101% accurate to the million dollar kirk on the right? Lets go!”

So why did he make a poll asking what we wanted if his plan all along was to just make a “Perfect shape kirk” that looks like a “MASTER” and not a “million dollar Kirk” or an “existing kirk” as his original poll/post was asking?

Now after all the recent talk about original Kirk sculpts and lifecast Kirks his new mask won’t be a “75 kirk based” replica of an existing kirk (even though that’s exactly what his poll was asking) but now a Lifecast ground up sculpt if I read that correctly? A ground up sculpt that’s going to be 101% accurate to the 75 Kirk Master? A Master that has never even been photographed unless he is referring to the completed mask Gene is next to? 3 or so pics from a 1970s camera that are all basically the same angle and make it 101% accurate to that mask using 3 reference photos? Trust the process I guess.

So umm.. I hope you guys caught what he did there.

As far as him saying all of todays existing kirks look different I 101% agree, but back peddling from his original poll and saying No no I’m making a ground up Lifecast sculpt to look like a Mask that was really never even really photographed. Don’t get me wrong I’m sure it’s going to look 101% Incredible just like all 101 of his other Myers/Kirks that he offers. I get it I suppose. All of his different versions have subtle differences and looks for different scenes, but knowing that he might want to stop using the phrase 100% accurate. 100% accurate to what exactly?

I feel he saw we were tired of “more of the same from the same” and back peddled his original post completely and now putting a new gimmick on a ground up sculpt using trigger words like “MASTER” and “101% accurate” but again don’t get me wrong there is nothing wrong with a good hustle and a nice gimmick to promote a new product as it’s just part of how business works, however I don’t understand why he doesn’t just say:

“I’ve listened to what the community wants and in doing so I decided to scrap my current project. I’m now aiming to make something new and different that I hope will bring a breath of fresh air to the Myers community with this new and improved ground up sculpt. A truly special piece that will capture the essence of a sculpt that has never accurately been attempted.”

The new flavor of the week are really well made lifecast based ground up sculpts so he is simply going to exploit that trend as I’m sure most of you guys like myself that’s been around for forever knows that’s just Nags style. It’s not wrong at all in fact I applaud him for deciding on creating something that’s actually different. I just dont understand why he felt the need to go back on what he originally said and come up with a new story rather than just saying “OK you guys are tired of the same stuff over and over I’ll do something new”

2 Likes